Comments (1)
Bob Warfield from Callidus Software has a great article on the Sand Hill Group’s site, bringing some rationality to the SaaS discussion. As we’ve been saying for quite some time, there is no one “right” model (on-demand or on-premise) for software deployments. I mentioned in my last post that we’re seeing great adoption of ATG’s OnDemand offerings from some very large companies. Likewise, some smaller companies prefer a traditional licensed application model installed on-site, despite the “conventional wisdom” of SaaS/on-demand being THE model for SMBs.
Now more than ever, customers should have the flexibility to chose the model that is right for them. This should be self-evident and alone should dictate a hybrid model. But even for companies that are not motivated solely by their customers’ best interests, Bob makes a really good point:
“For established software vendors, the transition to a pure on-demand model can be daunting. The financial, engineering and customer service issues aren’t anything to be taken lightly.”
The hybrid model is best for customers and best for vendors – I can’t see why any software company would choose one over the other.
Can you?
[tags] Saas, software as a service, on-demand, Callidus Software, Bob Warfield, Sand Hill Group [/tags]
- Having a highly generalized underlying rules processor built into the site infrastucture so that any action or characteristic of the visitor can be sensed, and any piece of content can be presented, and
- Presenting all that power to the merchandisers in an intuitive, easy-to-use, task-oriented application so they can implement their unique business strategies, and change them as frequently as they like, without launching IT projects.
Nina McIntyre
Bill Zujewski
Frank Lord
Ryan Hoppe
Kelly O’Neill
Damien Acheson